BONDSTATS / REGULATORY INTELLIGENCE
Regulatory intelligence / Interactive research instrument / 01

BASEL
EVOLUTION
MACHINE.

From Basel I to the final Basel III reforms: explore the rules that reshaped banking. Follow the architecture of capital, liquidity and leverage — then put a hypothetical bank through the machine.

Regulatory evolution
1988→26

Not a static chronology. A navigable model of what changed, why it changed and how regulatory constraints interact.

01 / Timeline
8 pivotal milestones
02 / Architecture
6 connected constraints
03 / Impact lab
Transparent scenario mathematics
04 / Evidence
Primary regulatory sources
01 / Regulatory lineage

Rules are a sequence of responses.

Select a milestone. Trace the regulatory problem, the policy response and the transmission into bank behaviour.

01 / 1988

Basel I

What materially changed
    Affected mechanisms

    Read primary document ↗

    02 / Regulatory architecture

    One bank. Six constraints.

    Inspect a regulatory mechanism to reveal what it measures, where it enters the bank balance sheet and what it connects to.

    BANKBALANCE SHEET
    03 / Quantitative impact laboratory

    Change the balance sheet.
    Watch the constraints move.

    All figures are hypothetical and user-adjustable. The calculations are deliberately transparent; they are not a jurisdiction-specific regulatory capital assessment.

    Hypothetical bank / USD billions
    Use of the output floor assumes a bank eligible to use internal models. Local implementation dates and transitional provisions may differ.
    Live calculations / simplified Basel III reference
    CET1 ratio
    —
    4.5% minimum / 7.0% incl. CCB
    Leverage ratio*
    —
    3.0% reference minimum
    Liquidity coverage
    —
    100% reference minimum
    Stable funding
    —
    100% reference minimum
    Output floor—
    Effective RWA—
    Floor uplift to model RWA—
    CET1 headroom over 7.0% reference—
    Calculation logic. Effective RWA = max(model RWA, standardised RWA × phase-in floor). CET1 ratio = CET1 / effective RWA. LCR = HQLA / net 30-day outflows. NSFR = ASF / RSF. *Leverage ratio uses CET1 as a conservative proxy for Tier 1 capital because additional Tier 1 capital is not modelled.
    Educational sensitivity model, not a bank-specific capital requirement or legal compliance test. Excludes deductions, RWA composition, capital instruments, supervisory overlays, systemic and countercyclical buffers, detailed liquidity haircuts, and jurisdictional adjustments.
    04 / Structural transformation

    What the Basel generations changed.

    Basel “IV” is an informal market label, not the Basel Committee’s formal name for the final Basel III reforms.

    1988 / BASEL I

    Common denominator.

    International minimum total capital relative to risk-weighted assets. Broad credit-risk buckets create comparability but limited sensitivity.

    Core anchor → 8% total capital / RWA
    2004 / BASEL II

    Risk measurement.

    Three pillars: minimum capital requirements, supervisory review and market discipline. Greater model sensitivity and operational-risk coverage.

    Core anchor → three-pillar framework
    2010–11 / BASEL III

    Resilience architecture.

    Stronger CET1 requirements, buffers, leverage backstop and internationally agreed liquidity standards after the global financial crisis.

    Core anchor → CET1 / leverage / LCR / NSFR
    2017–19 / FINAL REFORMS

    Limit model variability.

    Revised standardised approaches, constraints on internal models, an aggregate output floor and trading-book reforms.

    Core anchor → 72.5% fully phased output floor
    05 / Primary evidence

    Source-led by design.

    All visual elements and explanations on this page are original. External references are links to primary documents, not reproduced third-party graphics.

    Disclosure: TradingView and book links may be affiliate links. BondStats may receive a commission at no additional cost to you.